Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:54
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Are cold plunges good for you? Here’s what the science says. - The Washington Post
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The Elder Scrolls 6 fans salty over new trailer - GAMINGbible
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Red Sox rookie addresses alleged false claims about father’s background - Boston Herald
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
When writing a novel, how can a character be developed well, but QUICKLY?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sed autem voluptatibus minima impedit officia ipsa.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Summer Game Fest June 2025: Everything announced - Eurogamer
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?